Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces mounting criticism from former ally Avigdor Liberman, leader of the Yisrael Beytenu party, who has accused him of overconfidence and arrogance that contributed to Israel’s vulnerability ahead of the October 7 Hamas attacks.
Liberman, a former defense minister, expressed his concerns in a recent interview with The Times of Israel, where he emphasized that Netanyahu continues to prioritize his “status and ego” over the national security needs of Israel.
Liberman’s scathing remarks come in the wake of a catastrophic Hamas-led incursion into southern Israel, which resulted in the deaths of approximately 1,200 people and the kidnapping of 251 hostages.
He believes that Netanyahu’s political decisions during this crisis are not rooted in a cohesive strategy but are instead motivated by a desire to prolong the conflict until the next elections.
Once a staunch supporter of Netanyahu, Liberman has evolved into one of his most vocal critics. Having launched his political career within the Likud party, Liberman founded Yisrael Beytenu in 1999 after leaving Likud, citing Netanyahu’s inadequate handling of the Palestinian issue.
His critical stance intensified after he resigned as defense minister in 2018, following a ceasefire agreement with Hamas after a violent escalation.
In his interview, Liberman recounted an urgent warning he delivered to Netanyahu back in 2016, outlining the risks posed by Hamas.
In a top-secret document presented to Netanyahu, Liberman cautioned that Hamas was preparing to launch attacks within Israeli territory, employing well-trained commandos to capture communities and take hostages.
However, he claims that Netanyahu and military leaders dismissed his warnings, expressing a misguided confidence in their understanding of the situation.
Liberman criticized Netanyahu’s management of the ongoing war, stating, “He has no strategy.”
He advocates for a radical security approach, proposing the establishment of a 15-kilometer buffer zone in southern Lebanon, which would serve to protect Israel from Hezbollah. This zone would be maintained for as long as necessary to ensure Hezbollah’s commitment to renouncing its goal of destroying Israel.
Liberman also called for the completion of Israel’s disengagement from Gaza, arguing that the country should cease all supplies of water, food, and fuel to the Strip.
“We undertook an insane process called disengagement in 2005. We left the Gaza Strip, but we continue to supply everything,” he lamented, insisting that true disengagement would entail full detachment from Gaza.
At a recent anti-terrorism conference at Reichman University, Liberman laid out his broader vision for a comprehensive regional strategy, which includes support for the Saudi-backed Yemeni government to counterbalance the Houthis, further complicating an already tumultuous geopolitical landscape.
As the war continues and calls for accountability grow louder, Liberman’s criticisms represent a growing sentiment among political leaders who believe that Netanyahu’s administration is failing to adequately protect the nation’s security interests.
With the looming prospect of elections and an unstable security environment, the pressure is on Netanyahu to reevaluate his strategies and decisions as Israel navigates this critical juncture.
This article was created using automation technology and was thoroughly edited and fact-checked by one of our editorial staff members