|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Tensions between Israel and Iran are once again escalating, with analysts warning that another outbreak of war may be only a matter of time.
According to a recent New York Times report, failed diplomatic efforts, renewed nuclear activity, and continued military posturing on both sides are setting the stage for renewed confrontation.
The report cites U.S. President Donald Trump’s claim that American airstrikes in June “obliterated” Iran’s nuclear enrichment program during the 12-day war.
However, the expiration of the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JPOA) last month has left Iran’s nuclear activities without international oversight or restrictions.
Negotiations to restore the deal appear dead, as Tehran continues to block inspectors from accessing suspected sites, including its new facility at Pickaxe Mountain.
With no active talks and no verification of Iran’s uranium stockpile, officials warn that Israel could resume attacks if Iran moves closer to producing a nuclear weapon.
Defense Minister Israel Katz said following the ceasefire that he would pursue a “policy of enforcement” to prevent Iran from rebuilding its air capabilities — comments widely interpreted as signaling readiness for further strikes.
Ali Vaez, Iran project director at the International Crisis Group, said Tehran is preparing for such an eventuality. “Missile factories are working 24 hours a day,” he noted, adding that Iran plans to launch up to 2,000 missiles at once in any future conflict — a significant escalation from the 500 fired during June’s war.
Regional dynamics remain complex. Despite Iran’s isolation from the West, neighboring countries including Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the UAE continue to maintain ties with Washington and hope to advance a lasting peace in Gaza. However, these same nations are also attempting to preserve cautious diplomatic relations with Tehran.
Sanam Vakil, director of the Middle East and North Africa program at Chatham House, explained that Arab states “do not want another regional war” but still respect Iran’s capacity to create instability through its proxies in Lebanon, Iraq, Yemen, and the Persian Gulf.
Suzanne Maloney of the Brookings Institution described Iran as “weaker than at any point since the U.S. invasion of Iraq, but not so weak as to be irrelevant.” She added that a desperate Iran could act more dangerously in its efforts to project strength.
While the U.S. and Arab states continue to encourage new talks, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi recently rejected Washington’s conditions for negotiations, calling them “unacceptable and impossible.”
Both Iranian hardliners and moderates reportedly believe another confrontation with Israel is inevitable. Vaez told the NYT that Tehran hopes the next round will “produce a new equilibrium that will wipe out the sense of Iranian weakness.”
With most of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile still unaccounted for, the likelihood of another Israeli strike appears to be growing — leaving the Middle East on edge as both nations brace for what may come next.
