|
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Hamas is expected to reject US President Donald Trump’s 20-point peace plan aimed at ending the ongoing conflict in Gaza, according to a senior official of the terrorist organization cited by the BBC.
The official said the plan “serves Israel’s interests” while ignoring those of the Palestinian people. Key conditions in the proposal, including disarmament and the presence of an International Stabilization Force, are reportedly unacceptable to Hamas.
The BBC report contrasts with a Tuesday CBS story that suggested Hamas and other Palestinian militant groups might lean toward accepting Trump’s proposal. A Palestinian official indicated the plan is under responsible review by Hamas leadership both inside and outside Gaza.
The plan also calls for the immediate release of the remaining 48 hostages held by Hamas. However, the BBC noted that Hamas sees the hostages as their only “bargaining chip” and is reportedly resistant to releasing them at once.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu welcomed the peace plan after meeting Trump at the White House on Monday. The Israeli leader expressed full support for the proposal and emphasized that Israel would maintain the right to defend itself against Hamas if the plan is rejected.
Trump, addressing Netanyahu, said, “Israel would have my full backing to finish the job of destroying the threat of Hamas. But I hope we’re going to have a deal for peace.” He added that the US would remain involved in Israel’s security after any ceasefire agreement.
Despite Netanyahu’s agreement, the plan has faced criticism from various anti-Israel and Western activists, who have labeled it as emblematic of surrender, colonialism, and ethnic cleansing. These critics argue the proposal disproportionately favors Israeli security interests while limiting Palestinian agency.
Hamas’ review process has yet to produce an official response, leaving the prospects of a ceasefire uncertain. Analysts suggest the group’s reluctance to disarm or surrender hostages reflects both strategic and symbolic concerns, complicating efforts to achieve lasting peace.
Observers note that the plan’s acceptance hinges not only on Hamas’ decision but also on broader regional reactions. While some Palestinian groups may be open to negotiation, the overarching challenge remains reconciling security guarantees for Israel with demands for Palestinian sovereignty and humanitarian relief.
The coming days are likely to reveal whether diplomatic pressure, US involvement, and international mediation can convince Hamas to consider terms, or if the conflict will persist with escalating tensions in Gaza.
The international community continues to monitor developments closely, emphasizing humanitarian concerns, particularly regarding the civilian population affected by ongoing hostilities.
Hamas’ eventual stance on Trump’s plan will be a critical determinant in shaping the immediate future of the Gaza conflict and the broader Israeli-Palestinian peace efforts.